Platform Alternatives

12 Splunk Competitors and Alternatives Compared

Compare 12 Splunk competitors and alternatives by pricing model, architecture, and best-fit use case, with a full comparison table to guide your evaluation.
published on
October 6, 2026
by
Go Back

What are Splunk competitors?

Splunk competitors are SIEM and IT monitoring platforms that security and IT operations teams adopt to replace Splunk or to add a second platform for log sources that cost too much to ingest. We compared 12 of these platforms, nine for security and three for IT monitoring, to see which is best for your organization.

The 12 best Splunk competitors at a glance

  • Strike48: Best for security teams that left log sources out of Splunk to control cost.
  • Microsoft Sentinel: Best for Azure environments running Microsoft 365 and Defender.
  • Google Security Operations: Best for Google Cloud teams that want a fixed annual package.
  • Panther: Best for engineering teams that manage detections as code.
  • CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM: Best for security teams already running Falcon on their endpoints.
  • Exabeam: Best for SOCs fighting false positives and credential-based attacks.
  • IBM QRadar: Best for on-premises estates with mainframes or industrial systems.
  • Elastic Security: Best for security engineering teams that want to run their own detection infrastructure.
  • Datadog Cloud SIEM: Best for DevSecOps teams already monitoring applications in Datadog.
  • New Relic: Best for engineering teams that want to start monitoring on a free tier.
  • Dynatrace: Best for large enterprises that want automated root-cause analysis.
  • Grafana Cloud: Best for engineering teams that build on open-source monitoring tools.

What is Splunk?

Splunk is a Cisco-owned platform for collecting, indexing, and searching machine data. Splunk sells three products, and this guide covers alternatives to two of them.

  • Splunk Enterprise Security: The Splunk SIEM, covered in entries 1–9.
  • Splunk Observability Cloud: The Splunk IT monitoring product, covered in entries 10–12.
  • Splunk SOAR: A separate playbook product. Security teams replacing Splunk SOAR can start with our look at an AI alternative to SOAR.

How we evaluated these Splunk competitors

We scored every platform on cost model, log parsing, investigation quality, operational load, and how a security team reaches the log sources it currently excludes. Our sources were vendor pricing pages, cloud marketplace listings, Vendr procurement data, and G2 and Gartner Peer Insights ratings.

Disclosure: Strike48 publishes this guide and appears first on the list. We scored our platform on the same criteria as the others, and each entry names at least one limitation.

1. Strike48: Best for closing log coverage gaps without migration

Strike48 is an agentic log intelligence platform from Devo Technology, launched in January 2026. Strike48 queries logs that security teams already store via federated search and assigns narrowly scoped AI agents to investigate the results.

Splunk use cases covered: Alert triage, phishing investigation, patient-zero discovery, forensic evidence collection, and threat hunting across Splunk and every other log store the team runs.

Key features:

  • Search-in-place connectors read S3, Splunk, Elastic, and data lakes directly, so the team stores no second copy of its logs.
  • Strike48 parses a log only when an investigation needs its fields and generates parsers for new sources automatically.
  • A coordinator agent splits each alert into tasks, specialist agents handle each task, and analysts approve critical actions such as endpoint isolation.

What we like: Security teams keep every log source in scope and keep Splunk running underneath. In our early deployments, MTTD dropped below eight minutes.

Watch out for: Strike48 has a smaller deployed base than the other vendors on this list, so buyers will find fewer industry-specific reference customers. Queries against logs searched in place can run slower than queries against centrally ingested data, so security teams use Smart Collection, our AI-assisted collector, for sources with hard real-time requirements.

Pricing: We do not list prices publicly. Buyers get a quote through a demo request.

Reviews: Strike48 launched in January 2026 and has no G2 or Gartner Peer Insights reviews yet.

2. Microsoft Sentinel: Best for Azure-standardized security teams

Microsoft Sentinel is the Microsoft cloud-native SIEM. Microsoft bills Sentinel on an analytics tier for real-time detection and a cheaper data lake tier for long-term retention.

Splunk use cases covered: Log correlation across Microsoft 365, Azure, AWS, and on-premises systems, MITRE ATT&CK-based investigations, and automated response playbooks built in Azure Logic Apps.

Key features:

  • Security teams ingest Microsoft 365 audit logs, Entra ID sign-in logs, and Defender alerts at no additional cost.
  • Built-in connectors cover Microsoft services, third-party platforms, and on-premises systems.
  • Analysts triage incidents with Security Copilot, the Microsoft generative AI assistant.

What we like: Security teams can keep lower-priority sources in the cheaper data lake tier instead of dropping them.

Watch out for: Engineers have to rewrite every custom Splunk detection, dashboard, and correlation search from SPL into KQL (Kusto Query Language). Sentinel runs no real-time analytics on data lake tier sources until an engineer moves those sources to the analytics tier.

Pricing: Microsoft bills the analytics tier pay-as-you-go or on commitment tiers from 100 GB/day to 50,000 GB/day, and commitment tiers save up to 52%. Per-GB rates vary by region.

Reviews: G2 rates Sentinel 4.4/5 (296 reviews).

3. Google Security Operations: Best for predictable packaged pricing

Google Security Operations, which many security teams still call Chronicle, maps every log into a unified data model at ingestion. Google sells capacity in annual packages sized by ingestion volume.

Splunk use cases covered: Cross-source threat detection, YARA-L detection engineering mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, and indicator enrichment with Google threat intelligence.

Key features:

  • Analysts query one common schema instead of each vendor's log format.
  • Detection engineers write YARA-L rules that map to MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs.
  • Google enriches known-bad indicators with VirusTotal and Safe Browsing data.

What we like: Each package includes 12 months of hot retention, 700+ parsers, and 300+ SOAR integrations, so finance teams budget against a fixed annual price.

Watch out for: Google normalizes logs at ingestion, so the team still decides which sources to onboard. The Standard package caps detection content at 1,000 single-event and 75 multi-event rules.

Pricing: Google publishes the Standard package terms, and the Google sales team quotes higher tiers.

Reviews: G2 rates Google Security Operations 4.4/5.

4. Panther: Best for detection-as-code engineering teams

Panther stores logs in a Snowflake-backed security data lake, and engineers write Panther detections in Python and SQL. Databricks now owns Panther and is combining Panther with Lakewatch, the Databricks SIEM.

Splunk use cases covered: Detection engineering in version control, long-term log retention in a data lake, and cloud security monitoring for engineering-led security teams.

Key features:

  • Engineers test detections and deploy them through CI/CD pipelines.
  • Customers own the data in the data lake and can query that data at any time.
  • Panther prices by ingested volume with no per-source line items.

What we like: Engineers review, version, and roll back detections in the same workflow they use for application code.

Watch out for: Panther needs dedicated security engineers to write Python detections, run deployment pipelines, and tune Snowflake query performance. Buyers should ask Databricks how Lakewatch affects the Panther roadmap and pricing.

Pricing: Panther offers a free community tier and a custom Enterprise tier. The Panther AWS Marketplace listing shows $50,000 a year for 1 TB/month of ingestion on a 12-month contract.

Reviews: G2 rates Panther 4.7/5 (49 reviews).

5. CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM: Best for existing Falcon customers

CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM runs on the LogScale engine, which stores logs without an index. Security teams already running Falcon get endpoint, identity, and network data in the SIEM without separate connectors.

Splunk use cases covered: Endpoint-led threat detection, AI-assisted triage with Charlotte AI, and investigation of Falcon process, file, and network telemetry.

Key features:

  • Analysts investigate Falcon process trees, file integrity events, and network connections with Charlotte AI.
  • Analysts query Falcon data in CQL (CrowdStrike Query Language).
  • CrowdStrike charges no third-party per-GB fee on native Falcon telemetry.

What we like: Charlotte AI investigates with the full process and network detail the Falcon sensor records for each endpoint.

Watch out for: The Falcon sensor does not collect firewall, DNS, SaaS, custom application, or non-CrowdStrike endpoint logs. Security teams bring those logs in through connectors with less context, and CrowdStrike bills each connected source at the third-party rate.

Pricing: On the CrowdStrike AWS Marketplace listing, CrowdStrike prices third-party data at $5.95/GB with 13-month retention. Falcon Insight XDR customers get a 10 GB/day free tier for third-party data.

Reviews: G2 rates Falcon Next-Gen SIEM 4.2/5 (21 reviews).

6. Exabeam: Best for behavioral analytics and insider threat detection

Exabeam builds its New-Scale platform around UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics), which baselines each user's and device's normal behavior. Exabeam merged with LogRhythm in 2024 and still sells LogRhythm as a self-hosted SIEM.

Splunk use cases covered: Insider threat detection, credential misuse detection, risk-scored alert triage, and on-premises SIEM for regulated or air-gapped environments through LogRhythm.

Key features:

  • Smart Timelines assemble a user's or device's activity into one sequence, so analysts see an unusual login as part of a pattern.
  • Exabeam baselines AI agent behavior as well as human behavior.
  • Exabeam combines indicators of compromise and behavioral anomalies into one risk score per user or device.

What we like: Analysts work from timelines that show the full attack chain instead of triaging disconnected alerts.

Watch out for: Exabeam needs weeks of historical data before its baselines are reliable. An attacker working in an unmonitored SaaS application leaves nothing in the timeline.

Pricing: Exabeam publishes no rates and quotes through a demo request.

Reviews: Gartner Peer Insights rates Exabeam New-Scale Fusion 4.4/5 (278 ratings).

7. IBM QRadar: Best for legacy and hybrid infrastructure

IBM QRadar is a mature enterprise SIEM with connectors for mainframes, industrial control systems, and AS/400. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and still sells the on-premises product.

Splunk use cases covered: Real-time event correlation across on-premises and hybrid estates, insider threat detection with UEBA, and compliance reporting.

Key features:

  • Connectors reach mainframes, ICS, AS/400, and proprietary applications.
  • IBM licenses QRadar by Events per Second (EPS) and Flows per Minute (FPM).
  • A UEBA module adds behavioral detection for credential abuse and lateral movement.

What we like: Teams running decades-old systems next to cloud workloads get connectors that other vendors leave to custom integration work.

Watch out for: Under EPS licensing, the team still decides which sources justify license capacity. Palo Alto Networks is moving QRadar SaaS customers to Cortex XSIAM, so a QRadar quote today covers the on-premises product.

Pricing: IBM publishes the EPS and FPM model but no dollar figures, so buyers need an IBM quote.

Reviews: Gartner Peer Insights rates IBM Security QRadar SIEM 4.4/5 (672 ratings).

8. Elastic Security: Best for security teams wanting full infrastructure control

Elastic Security runs on Elasticsearch and combines SIEM, endpoint protection, and cloud security. Security teams deploy Elastic Security serverless, hosted, or self-managed.

Splunk use cases covered: Full-text search over large log volumes, threat hunting across timelines, and endpoint data collection with Elastic Agent.

Key features:

  • With self-managed deployment, the team keeps its data on infrastructure it controls.
  • Engineers can customize every detection rule, parser, and dashboard.
  • Elastic includes a 99.95% uptime SLA in its Platinum and Enterprise tiers.

What we like: Security teams in regulated industries get a level of data control that SaaS-only vendors cannot offer.

Watch out for: Security teams that run Elastic pay lower license fees and spend more engineering time. Someone has to size nodes, allocate shards, set index lifecycle policies, and tune parsers.

Pricing: Elastic prices hosted deployments by resources, serverless deployments by usage, and self-managed licenses by node count.

Reviews: G2 rates Elastic Security 4.5/5 (22 reviews).

9. Datadog Cloud SIEM: Best for existing Datadog observability customers

Datadog Cloud SIEM adds security detection to the Datadog monitoring platform. Security and engineering teams see security alerts in the same dashboards as operational alerts.

Splunk use cases covered: Correlating security logs with application and infrastructure metrics, MITRE ATT&CK-based detection for cloud-native workloads, and shared incident workflows for DevSecOps teams.

Key features:

  • Datadog runs security detection on the same log pipeline as the Datadog monitoring product.
  • Datadog maintains built-in detection rules mapped to MITRE ATT&CK.
  • Datadog connects to cloud platforms, identity providers, SaaS applications, and security tools through its integration library.

What we like: Datadog publishes its security pricing, so a security team can build a first cost model without a sales call.

Watch out for: Datadog offers less SOC-specific depth, such as compliance reporting and forensics tooling, than dedicated SIEM platforms. Datadog bills Cloud SIEM and log ingestion separately, so a security team that models only the SIEM rate misses the ingestion cost.

Pricing: Cloud SIEM costs $5 per million analyzed events per month on annual billing. Log ingestion costs about $0.10 to $0.12 per GB on top of that rate.

Reviews: Gartner Peer Insights rates Datadog Cloud SIEM 4.6/5 (86 ratings).

How the nine SIEM platforms compare

Swipe to compare →
PlatformBest ForArchitecturePricing ModelRating / Review SignalKey StrengthCeiling
Microsoft SentinelAzure-native environments with M365 and DefenderCloud-native SIEM with analytics and data lake tiersPay-as-you-go or commitment tiers from 100 GB/day, up to 52% offG2 4.4/5 (296)Free ingestion for Microsoft data sourcesCoverage still bounded by ingestion-time parsing decisions
Google Security Operations (Chronicle)Google Cloud orgs with log format maintenance painUnified data model with YARA-LIngestion-volume packages, tiers above Standard quote-onlyG2 4.4/5Auto-normalized schema, 12 months hot retention includedSame ingestion model, and Standard caps rule counts
PantherEngineering-led teams with detection-as-code maturitySnowflake-backed security data lakeFree tier plus consumption Enterprise (AWS Marketplace anchor $50K/yr per 1 TB/month)G2 4.7/5 (49)Version-controlled detection logic in Python and SQLRequires dedicated security engineering, roadmap now set by Databricks
CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEMSecurity teams deeply committed to the CrowdStrike ecosystemIndex-free (LogScale engine)Falcon data native, third-party data $5.95/GB, 10 GB/day free for Insight XDR customersG2 4.2/5 (21)Charlotte AI grounded in Falcon's own telemetryInvestigation quality and cost advantage weaken outside Falcon data
ExabeamSOCs where false positive rates and detection accuracy are the bottleneckBehavioral analytics (UEBA)Quote-onlyGartner 4.4/5 (278)Smart Timelines reconstruct attack chains from behavioral patternsUEBA only detects anomalies in monitored log sources
IBM QRadarEnterprises with legacy infrastructure (mainframes, ICS, AS/400)Enterprise SIEM with broad connector libraryUsage model on EPS and FPM, quote-onlyGartner 4.4/5 (672)Broad legacy log source supportSame ingestion-model ceiling, and SaaS customers are moving to Cortex XSIAM
Elastic SecurityEngineering teams wanting full infrastructure controlOpen-source roots (ELK stack)Resource-based hosted, usage-based serverless, node-based self-managedG2 4.5/5 (22)Full customization and self-managed data controlRequires Elasticsearch operational expertise on staff
Datadog Cloud SIEMOrgs consolidating security into existing Datadog monitoringAPM-integrated cloud SIEM$5 per 1M analyzed events/month (annual) plus separate log ingestionGartner 4.6/5 (86)Single pane for operational and security alertingSecurity-specific depth is limited versus dedicated platforms

Security tools vs. IT monitoring tools: What is the difference?

SOC analysts use security tools to detect and investigate threats. Engineering teams use IT monitoring tools to keep applications and infrastructure running. Both kinds of tools ingest the same logs, but security teams ask whether an attacker is in the environment, and monitoring teams ask whether a service is healthy. Entries 10 through 12 cover the platforms IT operations teams compare against Splunk Observability Cloud.

10. New Relic: Best for engineering teams that want a free tier to start

New Relic is an observability platform that collects metrics, events, logs, and traces into one data store. Engineers query that data in NRQL (New Relic Query Language).

Splunk use cases covered: Application performance monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, log management, and browser and mobile monitoring.

Key features:

  • Every account includes 100 GB of free data ingest per month and one full platform user.
  • New Relic charges no per-host, per-agent, or per-container fees.
  • One platform covers APM, infrastructure, logs, browser, mobile, and synthetic monitoring.

What we like: An engineering team can instrument production on the free tier and measure its real data volume before signing a contract.

Watch out for: New Relic charges for each full platform user, so costs grow with the number of engineers who debug production. New Relic has no SIEM detection or investigation features.

Pricing: After the free 100 GB, New Relic charges $0.40/GB for original data and $0.60/GB for Data Plus. Core users cost $49 per user.

Reviews: G2 rates New Relic 4.4/5 (586 reviews).

11. Dynatrace: Best for large enterprises that want automated root-cause analysis

Dynatrace is an observability platform built around OneAgent, a single agent engineers install on each host. Dynatrace bills through an annual Dynatrace Platform Subscription at published rate-card prices.

Splunk use cases covered: Automated service discovery and dependency mapping, root-cause analysis across distributed applications, and user experience monitoring.

Key features:

  • OneAgent discovers processes, services, and dependencies without manual configuration.
  • Davis AI, the Dynatrace analysis engine, runs root-cause analysis across the dependency map.
  • Grail, the Dynatrace data store, holds logs, metrics, and traces in one place.

What we like: Dynatrace publishes a price for every capability, so an IT operations team can model each charge before a sales call.

Watch out for: Dynatrace bills host memory, Kubernetes pods, log ingest, retention, and queries on separate meters, so forecasting one bill takes several estimates. Dynatrace requires an annual commitment and offers no permanent free tier.

Pricing: The Dynatrace rate card lists Full-Stack Monitoring at $0.01 per memory-GiB-hour and log ingest at $0.20 per GiB.

Reviews: G2 rates Dynatrace 4.5/5 (1,365 reviews).

12. Grafana Cloud: Best for engineering teams that build on open-source monitoring

Grafana Cloud is the managed version of the open-source Grafana stack, with Grafana for dashboards, Loki for logs, Tempo for traces, and Mimir for metrics. Engineering teams can also run those projects on their own servers.

Splunk use cases covered: Dashboards across many data sources, Prometheus-compatible metrics, and log aggregation with Loki.

Key features:

  • The free tier includes 50 GB of logs, 50 GB of traces, and 10,000 active metrics series each month.
  • With Adaptive Logs, an engineering team drops log patterns nobody queries.
  • Engineers connect Grafana dashboards to Prometheus, Elasticsearch, and cloud provider metrics.

What we like: An engineering team can start free and keep the same dashboards when it moves to a paid tier.

Watch out for: Grafana Cloud splits log pricing into process, write, and retain charges and bills metrics by active series. Grafana Cloud has no SIEM detection or investigation features.

Pricing: The Grafana Cloud Pro tier costs $19 a month plus usage, with logs from $0.40/GB to write. Enterprise contracts carry a $25,000 annual minimum.

Reviews: G2 rates Grafana Labs 4.5/5 (164 reviews).

Free and open-source Splunk alternatives

Splunk is proprietary software. Splunk Free lets a team index up to 500 MB a day but has no alerting or user roles, so security teams cannot use Splunk Free as a SIEM.

  • Wazuh: Wazuh is an open-source security platform under GPLv2 that combines log analysis, intrusion detection, file integrity monitoring, and compliance reporting.
  • Graylog Open: Graylog Open is the free, self-managed edition of Graylog. Graylog sells its security features in a paid edition, and security teams need engineers with search-cluster expertise to run Graylog at scale.
  • Elastic: Elastic offers free self-managed tiers of the Elastic Stack, the same software Elastic Security runs on.

Security teams that run these tools pay for servers, storage, and engineers instead of license fees, and they still write their own detection rules.

What this guide leaves out

  • Other ingestion-first SIEMs: Cortex XSIAM, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Sumo Logic, Fortinet FortiSIEM, Logpoint, Graylog Security, and Securonix all parse logs at ingestion, the same model Sentinel and QRadar use in this guide.
  • Cisco AppDynamics: Cisco owns both AppDynamics and Splunk, so an IT operations team moving to AppDynamics stays with the same vendor.
  • Log collectors: Fluentd and Logstash collect and route logs, but security teams still need a separate platform to detect threats.

Why do teams leave Splunk?

Self-hosted Splunk Enterprise costs about $1,800 to $2,700 per GB ingested per day, according to Vendr procurement data. A security team ingesting 500 GB/day pays $900,000 to $1.35 million a year before adding Enterprise Security.

To control that bill, security teams exclude lower-priority log sources. In our May 2026 survey of 100 security leaders, 65% reported that an investigation stalled because their tools could not access the data. An attacker who moves through systems whose logs the team excluded raises no alert and leaves no trail.

Since Cisco bought Splunk, procurement teams heading into a renewal cannot see where Cisco will take the product, and many run a full market review before signing again.

The coverage gap most Splunk alternatives leave open

Most platforms on this list still parse logs at ingestion. A lower per-GB rate lets a security team afford more sources, but the team still has to pick which sources to drop, and a team that moves to a SIEM that excludes the same sources keeps the same blind spots.

How federated search closes the gap

Federated search is a method of querying logs where they are already stored. The security team leaves logs raw in existing stores, and the platform parses only the fields an investigation needs, so analysts can query a source the team collected but never parsed. Our search-in-place connectors read S3, Splunk, and Elastic without data migration.

Why AI agents need complete log data

An AI agent reasons only over the data the security team gives the agent access to, so the agent misses any sources the team excludes. We build Strike48 agents with small, specific jobs because agents scoped that way hallucinate less. In our early deployments, agents found active phishing campaigns that legacy SIEM tooling had missed.

Free playbook

SIEM Modernization Playbook

We wrote this playbook for security teams that want to modernize a SIEM without a migration. Teams use the playbook to weigh coverage, cost, and architecture and choose between a full SIEM replacement and changes to their current SIEM stack.

How to choose a Splunk alternative

  • Known log exclusions: Strike48 fits security teams that left sources out of Splunk because of storage cost, or that want agentic investigation on top of Splunk.
  • Microsoft or Google Cloud shops: Sentinel fits Microsoft 365 and Defender environments, and Google Security Operations fits Google Cloud teams that want a fixed annual price.
  • Engineering-led teams: Panther fits security engineering teams that manage detections as code, and Elastic fits teams that can run their own Elasticsearch clusters.
  • CrowdStrike customers: Falcon Next-Gen SIEM fits security teams running Falcon on every endpoint.
  • Detection quality problems: Exabeam and QRadar fit SOCs with complete log coverage whose main problem is alert quality.
  • IT monitoring: New Relic, Dynatrace, and Grafana Cloud fit IT operations teams replacing Splunk Observability Cloud.

Before signing, buyers should factor in analyst time alongside license fees, since the median information security analyst earns $129,180 per year. Buyers should also count what share of their current log sources the new platform will monitor.

How to migrate from Splunk

A Splunk migration moves log sources, detections, dashboards, and retained data to a new platform while the SOC keeps monitoring. Teams run the migration in five steps.

  • Inventory: Engineers list every source Splunk ingests and every source the team left out.
  • Audit: Detection engineers retire correlation searches that never fire or that analysts ignore.
  • Rewrite: Engineers map the detections they keep to MITRE ATT&CK and rewrite the rest from SPL into the new platform's language.
  • Run in parallel: The security team sends the same events to both platforms and investigates every alert that fires on only one.
  • Cut over: Engineers move sources in batches and turn off Splunk ingestion once the alerts match.

Buyers should run each proof of concept on their own logs, since vendors demo on clean sample data. Security teams that run Strike48 on top of Splunk skip the cutover for the sources they leave in Splunk.

Find the log sources Splunk never sees

Every log source a security team leaves out of Splunk to save money is part of the network an attacker can move through without raising an alert. A cheaper SIEM that still charges at ingestion lowers the bill and keeps those blind spots.

See it on your logs

Close the blind spots before an attacker finds them.

In a Strike48 demo, our team reviews the buyer’s SIEM stack, shows which log sources the buyer’s tools cannot reach, and runs agents against those sources live.

Frequently asked questions about Splunk competitors

Is Splunk still relevant?

Yes. Splunk earned its eleventh consecutive Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader designation in 2025, and years of custom SPL searches make switching expensive. Security teams getting strong value from Splunk should price migration work into any comparison.

Does Cisco own Splunk?

Yes. Cisco completed its $28 billion acquisition of Splunk in March 2024.

Is Splunk a SIEM or a SOAR tool?

Splunk sells both. Splunk Enterprise Security is the SIEM, and Splunk SOAR is a separate product that runs response playbooks on Enterprise Security alerts.

What is replacing Splunk?

Sentinel fits Microsoft shops, Google Security Operations fits Google Cloud teams, Falcon Next-Gen SIEM fits CrowdStrike customers, and Strike48 fits security teams that want every log source in scope without leaving Splunk. New Relic, Dynatrace, and Grafana Cloud replace Splunk Observability Cloud.

How long does a Splunk migration take?

Security teams deploy cloud-native SIEMs such as Sentinel in days to weeks, then spend longer rewriting SPL detections. Behavioral platforms such as Exabeam need weeks of data to build baselines. Strike48 shared SaaS deployments go live in minutes because our connectors query Splunk data in place, and Smart Collection covers about 80% of log sources in under a day.

What is the difference between a SIEM and an agentic log intelligence platform?

A SIEM ingests and indexes logs and raises alerts for analysts to investigate. An agentic log intelligence platform like Strike48 searches logs where they are stored and uses AI agents to run investigations, with analysts approving critical actions.

Juan Del Rio

Juan Del Rio

Juan Del Rio is the Distribution & Enablement Coordinator at Strike48